FR. ZUHLSDORF:
Would you explain the intention, aspirations, and "spirit," if you will, of
the council fathers behind the liturgical reform? Does Your Eminence think
that the council fathers' intentions are well reflected in Sacrosanctum
Concilium? Where might they diverge?
CARDINAL MAYER:
The council started with the reform of the sacred liturgy, certainly out of
interior reasons, since the liturgy belongs to the heart of the Christian
faith. Moreover, the schema elaborated by the competent preparatory
commission had attained to a certain maturity, which was without a doubt
due in considerable measure to the liturgical movement that from the
beginning of the century had tried to revive the great liturgical tradition
of the Latin Church. It had, so to say, rediscovered the liturgical year
and the spiritual treasures contained in the liturgical books, and had
tried to involve more actively the faithful. There was considerable
activity, you know, at the Benedictine monasteries of Maria Laach and
Solesmes and Beuron. Pius Parsch had given us books on the liturgy and
liturgical year. The Holy Father, Pius XII, had given us the encyclical
Mediator Dei and had begun a reformation of the liturgical books for the
Easter vigil and the triduum. It has been over ninety years since Pius X's
Tra le sollicitudini of November 2, 1903. All of this work has to be
considered when thinking of the "intentions" of the fathers. READ MORE...